Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Lessons in SMU Hate - Conference Expansion.

The end of result of a major conference "reassigning" SMU to its ranks.

I’ve long been wanting to work up a Dallas Morning News hate post disguised as SMU hate. I actually started a post along those lines months ago and have continued building it over time as I’ve gained more kindling for the fire, but it may be too over the top even for this site. For instance, the Jean Jacques Taylor section alone is over 1000 words, but more than half of those are the F and C words, so you can see how the editing required to make it public would probably dilute the message too much for everyone to completely understand how I feel. Fortunately though, the DMN is the gift that keeps on giving in the hate department, and their own Kate Hairopoulos produced an article this past weekend that stands up well enough to garner its own posting entirely.

In Kate’s defense, the hate derived from this article isn’t due to her specific style as she mostly gives equal play to both TCU and SMU and, although it she definitely gives it that little SMU punch that DMN writers are required, it’s not enough to condemn her to the scathing diatribe that should hit the interwebs this summer and potentially spell the end of SpitBlood as we know it. So without further ado, let’s talk a little bit about the SMU Mustangs – your new Metroplex favorite to replace Missouri or Nebraska in the Big 12!

In all of this conference expansion banter – aside from my Pullitzer nominated piece from Monday – we’ve mostly focused on TCU going to the Big 12, with remaining in the MWC being a bit of a last resort should the conference shakeup truly go down. Well, turns out SMU has been doing the same thing, and they’re starting to make their case. Pretty amazing what one year of success will do for a school’s ego, but I suppose when you’ve been the middle section of the human centipede of college football for the past 25 years, you better strike while the iron is at least lukewarm.

From reading the article,which is culled from separate conversations with TCU AD Chris Del Conte and SMU AD Steve Orsini, SMU wants you to believe two things: One, that they can absolutely dominate and deliver the Dallas market for a major conference. In this case, that would presumably be the Big 12. And two, they’re an athletic program on the rise, so potential suitors better catch them before they hit the stratosphere and have enough clout to be an independent like Notre Dame (that's an exaggeration, but only a slight one). It's a pretty good case… if the presidents of your conference are a classroom of drunk four year olds.

I mean, God bless SMU. They covet our success so badly and are so envious that it’s not the 1980s anymore as far as the rivalry is concerned that they have to create this bizarre reality for themselves where being an also ran in Conference USA gets you national recognition. And, honestly, who can blame them? A lot of major programs out there would love to have the success that TCU has had under Franchione and Patterson. But, when a trained dolphin -or, in this case, an unpaid blogger- can deconstruct the arguments for your position with the bare minimum of research, you’re probably in over your head.

Taking a look at the whole “delivering the Dallas market” argument, just use common sense by looking at their attendance. Even this past season – the most successful season of SMU Football in 25 years – their own fans didn’t care enough to attend the games. And while TCU obviously has its own attendance issues in the face of success, at least our stadium has the capacity to encompass a growing fanbase. With a brand new, state of the art stadium that only holds 32,000 people, what kind of statement are you making about your expectations? That you basically don’t have any? And it’s not like anyone outside of the hardcore fan is tuning in to a Tuesday night CUSA game on ESPN featuring a .500 SMU team and the Tulane (insert mascot here) . So basically, you’re going to carry the 5th largest media market in the country despite not having the seating capacity to hold more than 1.3% - yes, I did the math- of them nor giving them the ability to watch you on television because you're not on? Yes, I realize that theoretically if they join a major conference, they'll inherit a better TV contract, but is anyone in north Texas going to watch an SMU game unless it involves Texas, Texas A&M or Tech?

And before you start accusing me of calling the kettle black, remember I took the negative nelly stance that we're likely not at the top of a major conference's list either due to these same things. But I just want to make it perfectly clear that we're higher up the list than SMU.

True story: I was at dinner Saturday night with some folks, and there was a table of people behind us that must’ve been family of an SMU graduate as their ceremony was earlier that afternoon. A couple of the guys started arguing about football and one, apparently an SMU grad, was ferociously touting the team’s 8-5 finish last year, and especially their whipping of a Nevada team without two of their biggest three offensive playmakers in the Hawaii Bowl. But his friends, who I didn’t catch their affiliation, pretty much ignored the guy, despite the fact that anyone in the restaurant could hear him yelling. And it wasn't like they were ignoring him in the sense of, "Yeah, good point. I have no rebuttal." It was more like when you turn on the TV and Barack Obama is giving a speech, how you just cast your eyes downward in shame and shake your head, like you don't even know where to begin naysaying. When your team’s success is so futile that you can’t even inspire your alcohol'd up buddies enough to acknowledge your position, you’re probably not in jeopardy of getting picked up by a major conference anytime soon.

The second argument – that SMU is a program on the rise and better be acknowledged – is also, at present, laughable at best. I mean, sure, when you go from a season where you won approximately 1 game to a bowl the next is, by definition, improvement. And I’m not sitting here discounting June Jones’ abilities as a miracle worker, despite accusing him of fielding a team of rapists in order to gain notoriety in an earlier discussion. But the fact that one year of football semi-success would be enough to have the Big 12 or Pac 10 - yes, the article mentions that -come calling is just ludicrious. Their basketball team consistently loses to ours, if that’s any indication of that team’s success. And you know what their next biggest, men’s (read: money making) sport is? Soccer. A team that they opted to field instead of a baseball team.

Yes, that’s right, they don’t even have a baseball team!

In their Big 12 related defense, neither do Colorado or Iowa State… but it’s fucking 0 degrees in both of those states during baseball months, so what are you gonna do? Purporting to be a major athletic program in the state of Texas and not having a baseball team is kind of like purporting to be a porn star while savoring your V card. UTA has a baseball team. So does Texas State. SO DOES PARIS, TEXAS JUNIOR COLLEGE. IT HAS 2200 STUDENTS! MY HIGH SCHOOL HAD 2200 STUDENTS. ALSO, A BASEBALL TEAM. HOW CAN THEY TAKE THEMSELVES SERIOUSLY? AND I DON’T EVEN LIKE BASEBALL, YET STILL MAKE THIS ARGUMENT! AAAAAH THAT SCHOOL IS SO TERRIBLE!!

But baseball aside – and, in truth, it is because football is what drives conference expansion – the scariest part about the article is that SMU genuinely believes that they are a better candidate to be adopted by a major conference than TCU. For me, the crux of Hairopoulos' article are these two paragraphs which, coincidentally, are the first two of the article, so at least you can’t say she’s lacking for direct assertion.

SMU athletic director Steve Orsini sounded like a chamber of commerce brochure as he started ticking off his athletic program's attributes: beautiful facilities, beautiful campus in Dallas. All the pieces coming together.

TCU athletic director Chris Del Conte offered just as much persuasion, citing a school-wide

mission for excellence illustrated by what he describes as the athletic department's 10-year transformation, which led to the Horned Frogs playing in a BCS bowl last season.”

That’s it, Steve? That’s all you’ve got? I mean, if you’re trying to sell a vacation home in Del Boca Vista to a menopausal divorcee, then your discriptions of locational beauty are certainly pertinent, but an athletic department? If he genuinely believes that campus attractiveness is a major factor in this process, then he's obviously never traveled to College Station, Lubbock or Stillwater. How can you even compare the two programs? If this is the summation of his head-to-head battles, Chris Del Conte has the easiest job in the country outside of a professional golfer that keeps his dick in his pants – or at least knows how to appropriate hush hush money when necessary.

When I first took in the article, I honestly thought I was reading The Onion, the same farcical publication that has printed articles headlined, “Special Olympics T-ball Stand Pitches Perfect Game” “Mormon Family trying to ignore dog’s huge boner” and “My baby don’t need no damn medicine.” Heck, while I’m at it, “Don’t Tell Me You’ve never wondered what Yoda’s penis looks like” and “Pedophile Nervous for First Day of school,” have also graced their pages over time. That’s how rambunctuously ridiculous I thought it was. And if you think I didn’t use this paragraph mostly as a way for me to google search my way down The Onion's memory lane, then perhaps, “I Hope my baby don’t come out all fucked up and shit” will make that more clear.

Is SMU’s vision of reality clearly as distorted as Steve Orsini makes it sound? One honest to god, roundly mediocre football season in the past 25 years, and you’re ready for the Big 12? SMU lost to Washington State last year. You wanna know how many other games Washington State won last year other than that one? Well, look at your butthole in the mirror and you’ll find your answer. Maybe it's a Dallas thing. I mean, Cowboys fans, myself included, have tried to excuse the futility of the past 15 years based on the five Lombardi trophies residing in the team's trophy case, which is ironic because it's the same thing we deride Spurs fans for. And SMU, even at its peak, never even came close to imitating the success of those two franchises.

Look, I'm all for SMU upgrading and making the Skillet rivalry a little more interesting because, let's be honest, playing SMU has only been about a notch above playing Tennessee Tech in recent years. But, even if they manage to win a game or two against us over the next decade, they still have a LONG way to go before they can compare their success to ours, not to mention garner the national respect we're just now starting to receive. Even if your little brother beats you in one on one in the backyard, he's still your little brother. You can still go into his room and break all of his toys without much fear of retribution. SMU can walk tall all they want, but, as the great philosopher Ric Flair has taught us, to be the man, you gotta beat the man and before that, SMU has to prove they can beat the boys of Conference USA. Until that day comes, just stay in your place, Ponies, and get the hell off my lawn.

And that's today's lesson in SMU hate.


Lyle Lanley said...

During a meeting with a client last summer, he (an SMU alum) told me that "the Big 12 is going to become the Big 14 by adding SMU and either Houston or TCU"

THEFINCH said...

nothing quite like a little hump day hate, well done sir

Bodenman said...

My computer frozen on that picture for a good 10 seconds. I am now skipping lunch.....bc I HAVE A RAGING BONER!

Excellent lesson in hate SWW.

Texas Hammer said...

What a bunch of pussies.

I HATE H said...

That was amazing

SuperSweet HornedFrog said...

that picture made me throw up on my dick

janorman74 said...

classic hate post - well crafted and argued - definitely appreciated the oninon headlines

oh and Fuck SMU

VikingFrog said...


Sir Wesley Willis said...

Yes, a major impetus for the story was to incorporate the Onion headlines and liken changing your conference makeup to include SMU to that of a bad sex change with the picture. As always though, it was driven by pure, unadulterated hate.

Shawn said...

"God" should be capitalized. Go Ponies!